Policies Public-facing policies

Appeals Policy

The appeals path for moderation, claim, accuracy, ownership, and policy decisions that affect users.

Version
0.1.0
Effective
May 20, 2026
Last reviewed
May 20, 2026
Review cycle
every 6 months
Master Policy Index entry
§4 #39

Policy text

An appeals path that depends on knowing the right person is not an appeals path. The Appeals Policy defines a documented, human-reviewed appeals route for every category of Map.ca decision that affects a user: moderation actions, claim outcomes, accuracy disputes, ownership conflicts, and policy-driven removals. It defines the response timelines, the human-reviewer requirement (Constitution §2 principle 4), the escalation tier, and the anti-retaliation protections that prevent appealing from becoming a risk.

It applies to users affected by Map.ca decisions, Pin owners, moderators, appeals reviewers, and the leadership tier that handles escalations.

Principles this policy enforces

  • AI assists, people remain responsible
  • Public data and personal data are not the same thing
  • Community benefit must survive scale

What it requires

  • Provide a documented appeals path for every user-affecting decision category.
  • Assign human reviewers, not AI, as the final authority on appeals.
  • Respond within documented timelines proportionate to severity.
  • Protect appellants from retaliation.

What it forbids

  • Do not resolve appeals using AI alone.
  • Do not require knowing a specific Map.ca person to file an appeal.
  • Do not retaliate against an appellant.
  • Do not close appeals silently.

How it applies

References